KC & Anor v City of Westminster Social & Community Services Dept. & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 198 (19 March 2008)
A marriage valid in Bangladesh and under Sharia law, but entered into by a person domiciled in England and lacking capacity to marry under English law, is not recognised as valid in English law due to the dual domicile rule and overriding public policy considerations; the High Court retains jurisdiction to protect the welfare of the incapacitated adult, including to prevent removal from the jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 198
- Parties
- Appellants: KC and NNC; First Respondent: City of Westminster Social & Community Services Department; Second Respondent: IC (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (family Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; declaration varied
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Marriages, Capacity to Marry, Public Policy Exception, Jurisdiction to Protect Vulnerable Adults, Voidable Vs Void Marriages, Best Interests of Incapacitated Adults
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
KC and NNC
Appellants
City of Westminster Social & Community Services Department
First Respondent
IC (a protected party, by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor)
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (family Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a marriage valid in Bangladesh and under Sharia law, but entered into by a person lacking capacity under English law, is recognised as valid in English law
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to prevent the removal of an incapacitated adult from the jurisdiction
- 3 Whether the Mental Capacity Act 2005 excludes the court's inherent jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
A marriage valid in Bangladesh and under Sharia law, but entered into by a person domiciled in England and lacking capacity to marry under English law, is not recognised as valid in English law due to the dual domicile rule and overriding public policy considerations; the High Court retains jurisdiction to protect the welfare of the incapacitated adult, including to prevent removal from the jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; declaration varied
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused on grounds 2 and 3 (jurisdiction and best interests)
- Permission to appeal granted on ground 1 (recognition of marriage); appeal allowed to the extent of varying the declaration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment