Swycher v Vakil
Dr Vakil, having been declared bankrupt in Portugal, lost standing to pursue litigation relating to his assets, including the present appeals. The Portuguese bankruptcy order is recognised by the English court as final and conclusive, notwithstanding pending appeals, and the trustee has had opportunity to intervene. There is no prospect of success in challenging the order refusing standing.
- Parties
- Defendant/part 20 Claimant: Stuart Simon Swycher; Part 20 Defendant/part 20 Claimant by Counterclaim: Mohammed Iqbal Abdool Karim Ayub Vakil (Sued as Mohammed Iqbal Abdool Karim Vakil)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Related Applications
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; related appeals struck out; judgment for respondent confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy, Standing of Bankrupt to Litigate, Effect of Foreign Judgments, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stuart Simon Swycher
Defendant/part 20 Claimant
Mohammed Iqbal Abdool Karim Ayub Vakil (Sued as Mohammed Iqbal Abdool Karim Vakil)
Part 20 Defendant/part 20 Claimant by Counterclaim
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal and Related Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Vakil, declared bankrupt in Portugal, has standing to prosecute appeals in England
- 2 Whether the Portuguese bankruptcy declaration should be recognised by the English court
- 3 Whether the bankruptcy declaration is final and conclusive for English law purposes
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Vakil, having been declared bankrupt in Portugal, lost standing to pursue litigation relating to his assets, including the present appeals. The Portuguese bankruptcy order is recognised by the English court as final and conclusive, notwithstanding pending appeals, and the trustee has had opportunity to intervene. There is no prospect of success in challenging the order refusing standing.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; related appeals struck out; judgment for respondent confirmed.
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal (2003/1313) dismissed.
- Appeals 2002/1050 and 1582 struck out for lack of standing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment