OOO Nevskoe v UAB Baltijos Šalių Industrinio Perdirbimo Centras
In the absence of a recognised foreign insolvency order, the 'first past the post' principle applies and the diligent creditor is entitled to enforce against the debtor's asset, subject to any countervailing considerations. The assignment to Dognus and any non-disclosure issues do not bar the making of a final TPDO but require disclosure and an opportunity for affected parties to be heard before payment is made.
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: OOO Nevskoe; Respondent/defendant: UAB Baltijos Šalių Industrinio Perdirbimo Centras (formerly UAB Alfagra); Third Party Respondent: Bilderlings Pay Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Enforcement / Insolvency / Final Third Party Debt Order (tpdo) Application
- Outcome
- Final Third Party Debt Order made, subject to conditions and directions.
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Insolvency, Third Party Debt Order, Assignment of Debt, Priority of Creditors, Disclosure Obligations, Brexit Legal Effects
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
OOO Nevskoe
Applicant/claimant
UAB Baltijos Šalių Industrinio Perdirbimo Centras (formerly UAB Alfagra)
Respondent/defendant
Bilderlings Pay Limited
Third Party Respondent
Procedural Posture
Commercial Enforcement / Insolvency / Final Third Party Debt Order (tpdo) Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a Final Third Party Debt Order should be made where foreign insolvency proceedings are pending but not yet recognised in England and Wales
- 2 Whether the assignment of the debt by the Claimant to a third party (Dognus UAB) bars enforcement
- 3 Whether the Claimant's non-disclosure of the assignment at the ex parte stage affects the order
Ratio Decidendi
In the absence of a recognised foreign insolvency order, the 'first past the post' principle applies and the diligent creditor is entitled to enforce against the debtor's asset, subject to any countervailing considerations. The assignment to Dognus and any non-disclosure issues do not bar the making of a final TPDO but require disclosure and an opportunity for affected parties to be heard before payment is made.
Court Disposition
Final Third Party Debt Order made, subject to conditions and directions.
Orders
- Claimant to disclose the assignment agreement to Defendant and Third Party within seven days.
- Third Party to pay €627,717.11 to Claimant upon satisfaction of conditions and after 28 days or determination of any application to vary/set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment