Akers & Ors v Samba Financial Group [2014] EWCA Civ 1516 (04 December 2014)
Article 4 of the Hague Trusts Convention does not exclude the application of the Convention to declarations of trust where the settlor already owns the property and declares himself trustee; the Convention applies to the validity and effects of such trusts. The lex situs (Saudi Arabian law) governs only whether the property can be alienated at all, not the validity or effects of the trust. Article 15 does not mandate the application of Saudi Arabian law to the transfer of beneficial interests in this context without clear evidence that the relevant rules are mandatory. The issues of governing law and the application of Article 15 could not properly be determined on a summary or stay...
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 1516
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Stephen John Akers; Claimant/appellant: Mark Byers; Claimant/appellant: Hugh Dickson; Claimant/appellant: Saad Investments Company Limited (in liquidation); Defendant/respondent: Samba Financial Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Companies Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Recognition of Foreign Trusts, Applicable Law to Trusts, Void Dispositions in Insolvency, Forum Non Conveniens, Cross Border Insolvency, Transfer of Shares in Civil Law Jurisdictions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen John Akers
Claimant/appellant
Mark Byers
Claimant/appellant
Hugh Dickson
Claimant/appellant
Saad Investments Company Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant/appellant
Samba Financial Group
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division, Companies Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Hague Trusts Convention (as enacted by the Recognition of Trusts Act 1987) applies to trusts of shares registered in civil law countries that do not recognise trusts or division of legal and beneficial ownership.
- 2 Whether Article 4 of the Convention excludes the application of the Convention to the transfer of beneficial interests in shares under declarations of trust.
- 3 Whether Article 15 of the Convention requires the application of mandatory rules of the lex situs (Saudi Arabian law) to the transfer of beneficial interests in shares.
Ratio Decidendi
Article 4 of the Hague Trusts Convention does not exclude the application of the Convention to declarations of trust where the settlor already owns the property and declares himself trustee; the Convention applies to the validity and effects of such trusts. The lex situs (Saudi Arabian law) governs only whether the property can be alienated at all, not the validity or effects of the trust. Article 15 does not mandate the application of Saudi Arabian law to the transfer of beneficial interests in this context without clear evidence that the relevant rules are mandatory. The issues of governing law and the application of Article 15 could not properly be determined on a summary or stay...
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Stay of proceedings set aside
- Matter to proceed to trial for determination of the substantive issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment