Hawksford Trustees Jersey Ltd v Stella Global UK Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 987 (19 July 2012)
The majority held that the ATE insurance premium taken out for the first time at the appeal stage, insofar as it covers the risk of incurring a costs liability at trial, is not recoverable as part of the costs of the appeal under s.29 Access to Justice Act 1999. Trial and appeal are separate proceedings for costs purposes, and the statute does not permit retrospective recovery of trial-related premiums incurred only at the appeal stage.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 987
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited as Trustee of the Bald Eagle Trust; Defendants/appellants: Stella Global UK Limited & Anor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Costs Order Following Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal on costs issue allowed in part; respondent not entitled to recover the ATE premium relating to trial costs as part of appeal costs.
- Legal Topics
- Recoverability of ATE Insurance Premiums, Interpretation of S.29 Access to Justice Act 1999, Costs on Appeal, Access to Justice Reforms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited as Trustee of the Bald Eagle Trust
Claimant/respondent
Stella Global UK Limited & Anor
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Costs Order Following Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an ATE insurance premium taken out for the first time at appeal, covering trial costs, is recoverable as part of the costs of the appeal under s.29 Access to Justice Act 1999.
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the ATE insurance premium taken out for the first time at the appeal stage, insofar as it covers the risk of incurring a costs liability at trial, is not recoverable as part of the costs of the appeal under s.29 Access to Justice Act 1999. Trial and appeal are separate proceedings for costs purposes, and the statute does not permit retrospective recovery of trial-related premiums incurred only at the appeal stage.
Court Disposition
Appeal on costs issue allowed in part; respondent not entitled to recover the ATE premium relating to trial costs as part of appeal costs.
Orders
- Appellants to pay respondent's costs of the appeal (excluding the disputed ATE premium for trial costs), subject to detailed assessment.
- The ATE premium relating to the risk of paying appellants' costs of the appeal is recoverable; the portion relating to trial costs is not.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment