Cuthbert v Gair & Anor (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) [2008] EWHC 90114 (Costs) (03 September 2008)
Fees paid by insurers to loss adjusters for pre-litigation work that would normally be done by solicitors are not recoverable as disbursements on an inter partes basis, as such costs do not fall within the categories of recoverable disbursements under the CPR and breach the indemnity principle.
- Citation
- [2008] EWHC 90114 (Costs)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Susan Elizabeth Cuthbert; Defendant/respondent: Stephen Ronald Gair and Wendy Isabell Gair trading as The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal / Appeal From Detailed Assessment Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Recoverability of Disbursements, Indemnity Principle, Litigant in Person Costs, Subrogation, Expert Assistance Exception
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Susan Elizabeth Cuthbert
Claimant/appellant
Stephen Ronald Gair and Wendy Isabell Gair trading as The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal / Appeal From Detailed Assessment Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fees paid to loss adjusters by insurers prior to solicitor instruction are recoverable as disbursements on an inter partes basis
- 2 Whether such costs breach the indemnity principle
- 3 Whether the work falls within the 'expert assistance' exception for recoverable costs
Ratio Decidendi
Fees paid by insurers to loss adjusters for pre-litigation work that would normally be done by solicitors are not recoverable as disbursements on an inter partes basis, as such costs do not fall within the categories of recoverable disbursements under the CPR and breach the indemnity principle.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Item 14 of the bill of costs (loss adjuster fees) disallowed in its entirety
- Costs of the appeal in principle awarded to the Appellant, subject to further submissions
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment