Michael Briley & Ors v Leicester Partnership NHS Trust & Ors
It was objectively reasonable for the Claimants to instruct Bhatt Murphy, a specialist London firm, given the complexity and specialist nature of the case involving Human Rights and Equality Act claims. The hourly rates claimed, including £350/hour for the Grade A fee earner, were reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. The pre-Inquest review costs were of significant use and benefit in the civil claim, both in respect of disclosure and the issues to be determined, and are in principle recoverable. The costs claimed are not disproportionate given the importance and complexity of the case, and the conduct of the Defendants.
- Parties
- First Claimant: Michael Briley; Second Claimant: Jacqueline Briley; Third Claimant: Simon Briley; First Defendant: Leicester Partnership NHS Trust; Second Defendant: University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust; Third Defendant: East Leicestershire and Rutland Clinical Commissioning Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Assessment Following Settlement of Civil Claim for Damages and Declaratory Relief After Death in State Care / Costs Assessment Hearing and Ruling
- Outcome
- Claimants succeed on the preliminary issues; costs claimed for pre-Inquest reviews and hourly rates allowed as claimed.
- Legal Topics
- Recoverability of Pre Inquest Costs, Reasonableness of Hourly Rates, Proportionality of Costs, Choice of Solicitor, Human Rights Act Claims, Equality Act Claims, Negligence, Fatal Accidents Act Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Briley
First Claimant
Jacqueline Briley
Second Claimant
Simon Briley
Third Claimant
Leicester Partnership NHS Trust
First Defendant
University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust
Second Defendant
East Leicestershire and Rutland Clinical Commissioning Group
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Assessment Following Settlement of Civil Claim for Damages and Declaratory Relief After Death in State Care / Costs Assessment Hearing and Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether pre-Inquest review costs are recoverable as costs of and incidental to the civil claim
- 2 Whether the hourly rates claimed by the Claimants' solicitors are reasonable and proportionate
- 3 Whether the choice of a London-based specialist firm was objectively reasonable for Leicester-based claimants
Ratio Decidendi
It was objectively reasonable for the Claimants to instruct Bhatt Murphy, a specialist London firm, given the complexity and specialist nature of the case involving Human Rights and Equality Act claims. The hourly rates claimed, including £350/hour for the Grade A fee earner, were reasonable and proportionate in the circumstances. The pre-Inquest review costs were of significant use and benefit in the civil claim, both in respect of disclosure and the issues to be determined, and are in principle recoverable. The costs claimed are not disproportionate given the importance and complexity of the case, and the conduct of the Defendants.
Court Disposition
Claimants succeed on the preliminary issues; costs claimed for pre-Inquest reviews and hourly rates allowed as claimed.
Orders
- It is reasonable and proportionate for the Claimants to recover the costs of preparation for and attendance at pre-Inquest review hearings.
- The hourly rates claimed by the Claimants' solicitors and costs consultant are allowed as claimed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment