Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Olympia Homes Ltd & Ors
Olympia acquired only an equitable interest in the gas board site due to the cancellation of Mr Hughes’ application for first registration, and the option in the deed of novation created an equitable interest binding successors. The Land Registry made a mistake in registering Olympia as proprietor free from Sainsbury’s interest. Rectification is justified as Olympia acquired the land on the assumption it would be subject to Sainsbury’s rights, and not to rectify would confer an unjust windfall.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd; First Defendant: Olympia Homes Limited; Second Defendant: Transco PLC; Third Defendant: Westpac Banking Corporation; Fourth Defendant: National Westminster Bank PLC; Fifth Defendant: Alan Hughes
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Rectification granted
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Register, Equitable Interests, Land Charges, Options to Purchase, Constructive Trust, Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd
Claimant
Olympia Homes Limited
First Defendant
Transco PLC
Second Defendant
Westpac Banking Corporation
Third Defendant
National Westminster Bank PLC
Fourth Defendant
Alan Hughes
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sainsbury’s option under the deed of novation created an equitable interest in land
- 2 Whether Olympia acquired a legal or equitable estate
- 3 Whether the Land Registry made a mistake in registering Olympia as proprietor free from Sainsbury’s interest
Ratio Decidendi
Olympia acquired only an equitable interest in the gas board site due to the cancellation of Mr Hughes’ application for first registration, and the option in the deed of novation created an equitable interest binding successors. The Land Registry made a mistake in registering Olympia as proprietor free from Sainsbury’s interest. Rectification is justified as Olympia acquired the land on the assumption it would be subject to Sainsbury’s rights, and not to rectify would confer an unjust windfall.
Court Disposition
Rectification granted
Orders
- Register to be rectified to record Sainsbury’s rights under the deed of novation as an enforceable estate contract
- Precise form of order and further relief to be determined after further argument
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment