Hawksford Trustees Jersey Ltd v Stella Global UK Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 55 (01 February 2012)
Where a trustee company enters into a contract on the basis of terms negotiated and agreed by a third party (here, Mr Begg), and the trustee's own decision is a formality dependent on that third party's recommendation, the common intention of the negotiator can be attributed to the company for the purposes of rectification if the company would not have contracted on any other terms and this was apparent to the counterparty.
- Citation
- [2012] EWCA Civ 55
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited as Trustee of the Bald Eagle Trust; Defendants/appellants: Stella Global UK Limited & Anor
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Contract, Attribution of Intention in Corporate Entities, Trustee Powers and Delegation, Earn Out Consideration in Share Purchase Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited as Trustee of the Bald Eagle Trust
Claimant/respondent
Stella Global UK Limited & Anor
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (chancery Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether rectification of the Amended SPA should be granted to exclude 2007 consultancy payments from the calculation of 2007 EBITDA for the purpose of the Minimum Earn Out.
- 2 Whether the intention of Mr Begg, as negotiator and beneficiary, can be attributed to Hawksford Trustees Jersey Limited for the purposes of rectification.
Ratio Decidendi
Where a trustee company enters into a contract on the basis of terms negotiated and agreed by a third party (here, Mr Begg), and the trustee's own decision is a formality dependent on that third party's recommendation, the common intention of the negotiator can be attributed to the company for the purposes of rectification if the company would not have contracted on any other terms and this was apparent to the counterparty.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Rectification of the Amended SPA to exclude 2007 consultancy payments from the calculation of 2007 EBITDA for the purpose of the Minimum Earn Out.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment