Equity Syndicate Management Ltd v Glaxosmithkline Plc
The parties to the insurance contract (GSK and Equity) had a common, objectively manifested intention to limit cover to ECOS vehicles only, as shown by the premium structure and negotiations; the wider certificate wording was a mutual mistake, and rectification is warranted to reflect the true agreement, defeating AXA's claim for contribution.
- Parties
- Claimant: Equity Syndicate Management Limited; First Defendant: GlaxoSmithKline PLC; Second Defendant / Claimant (in Contribution Claim): AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance SA; Defendant (in Contribution Claim): John Josiah and Keith Charlton (as representatives for members subscribing to Equity Red Star Syndicate at Lloyds for the year of account 2006-2007)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (insurance/commercial) / Judgment After Trial of Consolidated Actions (rectification and Contribution)
- Outcome
- Equity's claim for rectification succeeds; AXA's claim for contribution is dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Contract, Double Insurance, Contribution Between Insurers, Interpretation of Insurance Policies
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Equity Syndicate Management Limited
Claimant
GlaxoSmithKline PLC
First Defendant
AXA Corporate Solutions Assurance SA
Second Defendant / Claimant (in Contribution Claim)
John Josiah and Keith Charlton (as representatives for members subscribing to Equity Red Star Syndicate at Lloyds for the year of account 2006-2007)
Defendant (in Contribution Claim)
Procedural Posture
Civil (insurance/commercial) / Judgment After Trial of Consolidated Actions (rectification and Contribution)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the insurance contract between GSK and Equity should be rectified to limit cover to ECOS vehicles only
- 2 Whether AXA is entitled to a 50% contribution from Equity for settlement of Ms Ball's liability
Ratio Decidendi
The parties to the insurance contract (GSK and Equity) had a common, objectively manifested intention to limit cover to ECOS vehicles only, as shown by the premium structure and negotiations; the wider certificate wording was a mutual mistake, and rectification is warranted to reflect the true agreement, defeating AXA's claim for contribution.
Court Disposition
Equity's claim for rectification succeeds; AXA's claim for contribution is dismissed.
Orders
- The insurance certificate is rectified to limit cover to vehicles within the ECOS scheme.
- AXA's claim for a 50% contribution from Equity is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment