Webster, Re [2020] EWHC 2275 (Ch) (25 August 2020)
The High Court has no jurisdiction to rectify a tax return in these circumstances because Parliament has provided a comprehensive statutory regime for the correction and appeal of tax assessments, including Gift Aid claims. Even if a tax return were a unilateral instrument capable of rectification, the existence of the statutory regime excludes equitable remedies by implication. The Claimant's remedy lies within the statutory appeal process, not in the High Court's equitable jurisdiction.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2275 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Allan Firth Webster; Interested Party: HMRC (not named as Defendant but notified and participated by correspondence)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim for Rectification / Judgment After Disposal Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Instruments, Gift Aid Carry Back Claims, Jurisdiction of High Court Vs Statutory Tax Appeal Process, Careless Error in Tax Returns
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allan Firth Webster
Claimant
HMRC (not named as Defendant but notified and participated by correspondence)
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim for Rectification / Judgment After Disposal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to rectify a tax return under its equitable jurisdiction
- 2 Whether a tax return is a unilateral instrument capable of rectification
- 3 Whether the statutory tax regime excludes equitable remedies such as rectification
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court has no jurisdiction to rectify a tax return in these circumstances because Parliament has provided a comprehensive statutory regime for the correction and appeal of tax assessments, including Gift Aid claims. Even if a tax return were a unilateral instrument capable of rectification, the existence of the statutory regime excludes equitable remedies by implication. The Claimant's remedy lies within the statutory appeal process, not in the High Court's equitable jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Claim for rectification of tax return refused
- No order for rectification; Claimant to pursue statutory appeal process
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment