Places for People Pension Trustee Ltd v Places for People Group Ltd & Ors [2025] EWHC 3371 (Ch) (19 December 2025)
The court approved the settlement and granted rectification because the process was rigorous, the settlement was within the range of reasonable outcomes, and the evidence established the requisite subjective intention for rectification. The representation order was appropriate to bind all stakeholders, and the settlement was for their benefit.
- Citation
- [2025] EWHC 3371 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Places for People Pension Trustee Limited; 1st Defendant: Places for People Group Limited; 2nd Defendant: Places for People Homes Limited; 3rd Defendant (representative Beneficiary): Susan Parkinson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (trust/pensions) / Judgment on Approval of Settlement, Rectification, and Representation Order
- Outcome
- Settlement approved; representation order made; rectification granted as sought by Trustee.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Pension Scheme Deeds, Representation Orders Under CPR 19.9, Settlement Approval in Trust Litigation, Validity of Pension Scheme Amendments, Section 37 Pension Schemes Act 1993 Issues
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Places for People Pension Trustee Limited
Claimant
Places for People Group Limited
1st Defendant
Places for People Homes Limited
2nd Defendant
Susan Parkinson
3rd Defendant (representative Beneficiary)
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (trust/pensions) / Judgment on Approval of Settlement, Rectification, and Representation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should approve a complex settlement resolving validity, section 37, and rectification issues affecting the Places for People Group Retirement Benefit Scheme; whether a representation order should be made under CPR 19.9; whether rectification of various deeds and rules should be granted
Ratio Decidendi
The court approved the settlement and granted rectification because the process was rigorous, the settlement was within the range of reasonable outcomes, and the evidence established the requisite subjective intention for rectification. The representation order was appropriate to bind all stakeholders, and the settlement was for their benefit.
Court Disposition
Settlement approved; representation order made; rectification granted as sought by Trustee.
Orders
- Representation order under CPR 19.9 appointing Trustee and Representative Beneficiary as representatives on an issue-by-issue basis.
- Approval of the settlement resolving validity, section 37, and rectification issues as binding on all stakeholders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment