Wyatt & Ors v Tyrrell & Ors [2010] EWHC 3633 (Ch) (27 July 2010)
The Deed of Exclusion was set aside under the Hastings Bass principle because the trustees failed to consider the consequences of the exclusion if the commercial rationale ceased to exist, and would not have executed the deed in its form had they done so.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 3633 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimants: Wyatt and Others; Defendants: Tyrrell and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Judgment After Oral Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted on the third ground (Hastings Bass principle); Deed of Exclusion set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Trust Deeds, Setting Aside Deeds for Mistake, Hastings Bass Principle, Trustee Duties, Beneficiary Exclusion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Wyatt and Others
Claimants
Tyrrell and Others
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Judgment After Oral Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deed of Exclusion should be rectified to replace 'irrevocably' with 'revocably'
- 2 Whether the Deed of Exclusion should be set aside for mistake
- 3 Whether the Deed of Exclusion should be declared void or voidable under the Hastings Bass principle
Ratio Decidendi
The Deed of Exclusion was set aside under the Hastings Bass principle because the trustees failed to consider the consequences of the exclusion if the commercial rationale ceased to exist, and would not have executed the deed in its form had they done so.
Court Disposition
Application granted on the third ground (Hastings Bass principle); Deed of Exclusion set aside.
Orders
- The Deed of Exclusion dated 18 June 2003 is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment