Bell v Georgiou & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 1510 (4 October 2002)
There was insufficient evidence that the testatrix intended to give the nil rate band to the applicant or only £11,000 to the RAF Benevolent Fund; the will as drawn reflected her intentions as evidenced by the specific sum of £150,000 bequeathed to the applicant and the residue to the RAF Benevolent Fund.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1510
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Douglas William Dawson Bell; Defendant/respondent: Sotira Ellen Georgiou; Defendant/respondent: Royal Air Force Benevolent Fund
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) Decision
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Rectification of Wills, Testator's Intention, Nil Rate Band, Partial Intestacy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Douglas William Dawson Bell
Claimant/applicant
Sotira Ellen Georgiou
Defendant/respondent
Royal Air Force Benevolent Fund
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the will should be rectified to give effect to the alleged intention of the testatrix to bequeath the nil rate band to the applicant
- 2 Whether the will resulted in a partial intestacy as to the residue not specifically bequeathed
Ratio Decidendi
There was insufficient evidence that the testatrix intended to give the nil rate band to the applicant or only £11,000 to the RAF Benevolent Fund; the will as drawn reflected her intentions as evidenced by the specific sum of £150,000 bequeathed to the applicant and the residue to the RAF Benevolent Fund.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Applications refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment