Hagan v Secretary Of State For Social Security [2001] EWCA Civ 1452 (30 July 2001)
A claimant may make separate claims for REA in respect of each industrial accident that causes a change in regular occupation and reduction in earnings, with the statutory cap applying to each claim. There is no statutory requirement to aggregate all accidents into a single REA claim. The Commissioner's decision to limit claimants to one aggregated REA award was erroneous in law.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1452
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: John Hagan; Defendant/appellant: Secretary of State for Social Security
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Social Security Commissioners / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Reduced Earnings Allowance, Industrial Injuries, Disablement Pension, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Hagan
Claimant/respondent
Secretary of State for Social Security
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Social Security Commissioners / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant may make multiple claims for Reduced Earnings Allowance (REA) for successive industrial accidents, each causing a change in regular occupation and reduction in earnings, or whether only one aggregated claim is permitted.
Ratio Decidendi
A claimant may make separate claims for REA in respect of each industrial accident that causes a change in regular occupation and reduction in earnings, with the statutory cap applying to each claim. There is no statutory requirement to aggregate all accidents into a single REA claim. The Commissioner's decision to limit claimants to one aggregated REA award was erroneous in law.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Decision of the Social Security Commissioner set aside in part; paragraphs 1 to 8 of the Commissioner's decision affirmed; paragraphs 9, 10, and 12 set aside; claimant not entitled to reduced earnings allowance between 7th and 13th January 1998; no order for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment