Agco Ltd. v Massey Ferguson Works Pension Trust Ltd & Ors [2003] EWCA Civ 1044 (17 July 2003)
The phrase 'retires from Service at the request of the Employer' in the pension scheme rules does not include dismissal for redundancy (compulsory or voluntary); it refers to consensual retirement or resignation at the employer's request, not enforced dismissal. Dismissal for misconduct is not covered. The scheme's structure, language, and purpose do not support a broader interpretation.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1044
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: AGCO Limited; First Defendant/respondent: Massey Ferguson Works Pension Trust Limited; Second Defendant/respondent: Ronald Vincent Bradbury; Third Defendant/respondent: Alan Samuel Chater
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; declarations set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Early Retirement, Pension Scheme Interpretation, Dismissal, Voluntary Redundancy, Compulsory Redundancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AGCO Limited
Claimant/appellant
Massey Ferguson Works Pension Trust Limited
First Defendant/respondent
Ronald Vincent Bradbury
Second Defendant/respondent
Alan Samuel Chater
Third Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does 'retires from Service at the request of the Employer' in pension scheme rules include redundancy (compulsory or voluntary)?
- 2 Does dismissal (including redundancy) qualify as retirement at employer's request for pension purposes?
- 3 Are employees dismissed for misconduct entitled to unreduced pension under the rule?
Ratio Decidendi
The phrase 'retires from Service at the request of the Employer' in the pension scheme rules does not include dismissal for redundancy (compulsory or voluntary); it refers to consensual retirement or resignation at the employer's request, not enforced dismissal. Dismissal for misconduct is not covered. The scheme's structure, language, and purpose do not support a broader interpretation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; declarations set aside.
Orders
- Declarations granted by the judge are set aside.
- Rule 13(c)(iii) does not cover compulsory or voluntary redundancy or dismissal on notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment