AS (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] EWCA Civ 824 (25 June 2015)
There is a real prospect of success in the argument that the First Tier Tribunal judge erred in law by not concluding that the appellant, as a woman subject to domestic violence in Iran, was a member of a particular social group for the purposes of the Refugee Convention.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 824
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: AS (Iran); Respondent/defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Upper Tribunal (immigration and Asylum Chamber)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Status, Particular Social Group, Domestic Violence, Article 3 ECHR, Sur Place Activities, Standard of Proof
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AS (Iran)
Applicant/claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal From Upper Tribunal (immigration and Asylum Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is a member of a particular social group due to domestic violence in Iran
- 2 Whether the First Tier Tribunal erred in law in its assessment of risk on Convention grounds (religion, political opinion, social group, illegal exit)
- 3 Whether the findings regarding risk of suicide and medical evidence were legally adequate
Ratio Decidendi
There is a real prospect of success in the argument that the First Tier Tribunal judge erred in law by not concluding that the appellant, as a woman subject to domestic violence in Iran, was a member of a particular social group for the purposes of the Refugee Convention.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is granted for a full hearing before three judges, including an immigration specialist, with a time estimate of one day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment