Consolidated Finance Ltd v Collins & Anor [2013] EWCA Civ 475 (08 May 2013)
The Facility Letter between Consolidated and Mrs Collins was a refinancing agreement under section 11(1)(c) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, not a restricted-use agreement under section 11(1)(b); therefore, it was regulated and unenforceable in the present proceedings due to non-compliance with statutory requirements.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 475
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Consolidated Finance Limited; Defendant/appellant: Tracy Anne Collins; Defendant/appellant: Innes Graham Collins; Defendant/appellant: Nicholas Charles Rothoff; Defendant/appellant: Maurice Bailey; Defendant/appellant: Diane Bailey; Defendant/appellant: John Hugh Toye; Defendant/appellant: Ann Elizabeth Toye; Intervener: The Office of Fair Trading
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Central London County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Regulated Agreements, Exempt Agreements, Refinancing, Consumer Protection, Solicitor Duties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Consolidated Finance Limited
Claimant/respondent
Tracy Anne Collins
Defendant/appellant
Innes Graham Collins
Defendant/appellant
Nicholas Charles Rothoff
Defendant/appellant
Maurice Bailey
Defendant/appellant
Diane Bailey
Defendant/appellant
John Hugh Toye
Defendant/appellant
Ann Elizabeth Toye
Defendant/appellant
The Office of Fair Trading
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Central London County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement between Consolidated and Mrs Collins was regulated or exempt under the Consumer Credit Act 1974
- 2 Whether Mrs Collins was indebted to Protection or Consolidated
- 3 Whether the Facility Letter constituted a restricted-use or refinancing agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The Facility Letter between Consolidated and Mrs Collins was a refinancing agreement under section 11(1)(c) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, not a restricted-use agreement under section 11(1)(b); therefore, it was regulated and unenforceable in the present proceedings due to non-compliance with statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Claims by Consolidated Finance Limited are unenforceable in the present proceedings
- Parties to agree consequential orders
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment