Charman v New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd

Charman v New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd

The premium review clause was not validly invoked for the 1999 year as there was no clear, objective notice to the Syndicates based on extraordinary claims development in 1998, nor was a new premium nominated within a reasonable time. The invocation in 1997 could not operate prospectively or as a continuing act for subsequent years. There was no waiver or estoppel to relieve NCR of its obligations. The contract remained in force for three years at the agreed premium, and NCR was obliged to indemnify the Syndicates for losses in 1998 and 1999.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: John Robert Charman (suing on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of Lloyd’s Syndicates 488 and 2488); Defendant/respondent: New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (in liquidation)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 October 2003
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment for the Syndicates
Legal Topics
Reinsurance Contracts, Premium Review Clauses, Contract Termination, Notice Requirements, Waiver and Estoppel
Contract Law Insurance Law Reinsurance Contracts Premium Review Clauses Contract Termination Notice Requirements Waiver and Estoppel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

John Robert Charman (suing on his own behalf and on behalf of all other members of Lloyd’s Syndicates 488 and 2488)

Claimant/appellant

New Cap Reinsurance Corporation Ltd (in liquidation)

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Queen’s Bench Division, Commercial Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the premium review clause was validly invoked for the 1999 year based on extraordinary claims development in 1998
  2. 2 Whether the contract lapsed or continued in the absence of a nominated increased premium
  3. 3 Whether the invocation of the clause in 1997 was a continuing act for subsequent years

Ratio Decidendi

The premium review clause was not validly invoked for the 1999 year as there was no clear, objective notice to the Syndicates based on extraordinary claims development in 1998, nor was a new premium nominated within a reasonable time. The invocation in 1997 could not operate prospectively or as a continuing act for subsequent years. There was no waiver or estoppel to relieve NCR of its obligations. The contract remained in force for three years at the agreed premium, and NCR was obliged to indemnify the Syndicates for losses in 1998 and 1999.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment for the Syndicates

Orders

  • The reinsurance cover subsisted in full force and effect for three years from January 1997.
  • New Cap Re obliged to indemnify the Syndicates for losses during the three-year period from 1 January 1997.