PJSC National Bank Trust & Anor v Boris Mints & Ors [2020] EWHC 3253 (Comm) (25 November 2020)
Permission to release the Claimants from the undertaking is granted because the Claimants and Bank Otkritie face a real risk of criminal liability and severe sanctions in Russia if they do not comply with the Russian Order. The court is satisfied that special circumstances exist, including compulsion under foreign law, the need to avoid grave injustice, and the public interest in international cooperation in fraud cases. The majority of the material is already in the public domain under CPR 31.22, and no significant injustice to the Defendants is identified. The balance of justice favours granting permission for disclosure to the Russian investigator.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 3253 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: PJSC National Bank Trust; Claimant: PJSC Bank Otkritie Financial Corporation; First Defendant: Boris Mints; Second Defendant: Dmitry Mints; Third Defendant: Alexander Mints; Fourth Defendant: Igor Mints
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Proceedings (worldwide Freezing Order and Asset Disclosure) / Interlocutory Application to Vary Undertaking / Permission to Disclose Asset Documents to Russian Authorities
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Release of Undertakings, Worldwide Freezing Orders, Asset Disclosure, Collateral Use of Disclosed Documents, International Judicial Cooperation, CPR 31.22
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
PJSC National Bank Trust
Claimant
PJSC Bank Otkritie Financial Corporation
Claimant
Boris Mints
First Defendant
Dmitry Mints
Second Defendant
Alexander Mints
Third Defendant
Igor Mints
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Proceedings (worldwide Freezing Order and Asset Disclosure) / Interlocutory Application to Vary Undertaking / Permission to Disclose Asset Documents to Russian Authorities
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimants should be released from an express undertaking not to use asset disclosure documents for purposes other than these proceedings, to permit compliance with a Russian criminal court order requiring disclosure to a Russian investigator.
- 2 Whether the requirements of CPR 31.22 and the principles for release of undertakings are satisfied in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to release the Claimants from the undertaking is granted because the Claimants and Bank Otkritie face a real risk of criminal liability and severe sanctions in Russia if they do not comply with the Russian Order. The court is satisfied that special circumstances exist, including compulsion under foreign law, the need to avoid grave injustice, and the public interest in international cooperation in fraud cases. The majority of the material is already in the public domain under CPR 31.22, and no significant injustice to the Defendants is identified. The balance of justice favours granting permission for disclosure to the Russian investigator.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Claimants are permitted to disclose the asset disclosure documents and affidavits served and/or filed in these proceedings by the First to Third Defendants to the Russian criminal investigator in compliance with the Russian Order.
- The release is limited to the extent necessary to comply with the Russian Order and does not extend to wider use of the documents.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment