Robinson -Tait & Anor v Cataldo & Anor
Relief against sanctions was granted because the failures to comply with the Costs Practice Direction were minor, caused no substantial prejudice to the Defendants, and the main information was disclosed informally within months. The mistakes were not intentional and did not jeopardise the administration of justice.
- Parties
- First Claimant: Carola Robinson-Tait; Second Claimant: Julian Robinson-Tait (by his Mother and Litigation Friend, Carola Robinson-Tait); First Defendant: Giovanni Cataldo; Second Defendant: Phaedra Cataldo Markham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Application / Judgment on Applications for Relief Against Sanctions
- Outcome
- Relief against sanctions granted to Claimants.
- Legal Topics
- Relief Against Sanctions, Notice of Funding, Conditional Fee Agreements, After the Event Insurance, Costs Practice Direction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Carola Robinson-Tait
First Claimant
Julian Robinson-Tait (by his Mother and Litigation Friend, Carola Robinson-Tait)
Second Claimant
Giovanni Cataldo
First Defendant
Phaedra Cataldo Markham
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Costs Application / Judgment on Applications for Relief Against Sanctions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether relief against sanctions should be granted for failures to comply with Costs Practice Direction regarding Notice of Funding for ATE insurance and CFAs
Ratio Decidendi
Relief against sanctions was granted because the failures to comply with the Costs Practice Direction were minor, caused no substantial prejudice to the Defendants, and the main information was disclosed informally within months. The mistakes were not intentional and did not jeopardise the administration of justice.
Court Disposition
Relief against sanctions granted to Claimants.
Orders
- Claimants granted full relief against sanctions for failures to comply with Costs Practice Direction.
- Date fixed for hearing argument as to the cost of these applications, provisionally appointed for 2 consecutive days commencing Thursday 17 June 2010, starting at 11 a.m. each day.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment