Eden v Rubin [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB) (24 November 2011)
Relief from sanctions was refused because the claimant's failures to comply with Unless Orders were extensive, deliberate, and ongoing; the subsequent documents did not remedy the defaults; the claim for loss of earnings was inherently weak and unsupported; and the balancing exercise under CPR 3.9 overwhelmingly favoured the defendant.
- Citation
- [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Simon Gregory Eden; Defendant/respondent: Frances Rubin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Refusal of Relief From Sanctions / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; relief from sanctions refused.
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Unless Orders, Disclosure, Loss of Earnings, CPR 3.9
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Gregory Eden
Claimant/appellant
Frances Rubin
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Relief From Sanctions / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be granted relief from sanctions for failure to comply with Unless Orders
- 2 Adequacy of claimant's disclosure and answers to Part 18 Request
- 3 Strength of claimant's claim for loss of earnings
Ratio Decidendi
Relief from sanctions was refused because the claimant's failures to comply with Unless Orders were extensive, deliberate, and ongoing; the subsequent documents did not remedy the defaults; the claim for loss of earnings was inherently weak and unsupported; and the balancing exercise under CPR 3.9 overwhelmingly favoured the defendant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; relief from sanctions refused.
Orders
- Unless Orders of January 2011 to take effect
- Claimant's claim for loss of earnings struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment