Eden v Rubin [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB) (24 November 2011)

Eden v Rubin [2011] EWHC 3090 (QB) (24 November 2011)

Relief from sanctions was refused because the claimant's failures to comply with Unless Orders were extensive, deliberate, and ongoing; the subsequent documents did not remedy the defaults; the claim for loss of earnings was inherently weak and unsupported; and the balancing exercise under CPR 3.9 overwhelmingly favoured the defendant.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 3090 (QB)
Parties
Claimant/appellant: Simon Gregory Eden; Defendant/respondent: Frances Rubin
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Refusal of Relief From Sanctions / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; relief from sanctions refused.
Legal Topics
Relief From Sanctions, Unless Orders, Disclosure, Loss of Earnings, CPR 3.9

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Gregory Eden

Claimant/appellant

Frances Rubin

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal Against Refusal of Relief From Sanctions / Judgment on Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the claimant should be granted relief from sanctions for failure to comply with Unless Orders
  2. 2 Adequacy of claimant's disclosure and answers to Part 18 Request
  3. 3 Strength of claimant's claim for loss of earnings

Ratio Decidendi

Relief from sanctions was refused because the claimant's failures to comply with Unless Orders were extensive, deliberate, and ongoing; the subsequent documents did not remedy the defaults; the claim for loss of earnings was inherently weak and unsupported; and the balancing exercise under CPR 3.9 overwhelmingly favoured the defendant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; relief from sanctions refused.

Orders

  • Unless Orders of January 2011 to take effect
  • Claimant's claim for loss of earnings struck out