Patterson (The Trustee In Bankruptcy of George Spencer) v Spencer & Ors [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch) (17 June 2014)
Given the Appellant's persistent failure to comply with court orders, the history of delay, and the lack of credible explanation for the default, relief from sanctions is refused in accordance with the robust approach mandated by Mitchell and CPR 3.9(1).
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1878 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant and Respondent: Simon Patterson (The Trustee in Bankruptcy of George Spencer); First Defendant: George Spencer; Second Defendant (deceased): Linda Spencer; Third Defendant: Beryl Delores Lennon; Fourth Defendant: Winston Bancrawf Spencer; Fifth Defendant: Gary Anthony Spencer; Sixth Defendant and Appellant: Beverly Monica Spencer
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (application for Relief From Sanctions) / Application for Relief From Sanctions Under CPR 3.9(1) Following Strike Out of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for relief from sanctions dismissed; appeal remains struck out.
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Debarring Orders, Compliance With Court Orders, Appeal Procedure, Insolvency Act 1986 S.423 and S.339
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Patterson (The Trustee in Bankruptcy of George Spencer)
Claimant and Respondent
George Spencer
First Defendant
Linda Spencer
Second Defendant (deceased)
Beryl Delores Lennon
Third Defendant
Winston Bancrawf Spencer
Fourth Defendant
Gary Anthony Spencer
Fifth Defendant
Beverly Monica Spencer
Sixth Defendant and Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (application for Relief From Sanctions) / Application for Relief From Sanctions Under CPR 3.9(1) Following Strike Out of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant should be granted relief from sanctions under CPR 3.9(1) for failure to comply with an order to file a transcript of judgment, resulting in the striking out of her appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
Given the Appellant's persistent failure to comply with court orders, the history of delay, and the lack of credible explanation for the default, relief from sanctions is refused in accordance with the robust approach mandated by Mitchell and CPR 3.9(1).
Court Disposition
Application for relief from sanctions dismissed; appeal remains struck out.
Orders
- Application for relief from sanctions under CPR 3.9(1) is dismissed.
- Appeal of the Appellant remains struck out pursuant to the order of Arnold J dated 4th March 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment