Lakhani & Anor v Mahmud & Ors [2017] EWHC 1713 (Ch) (05 July 2017)
The judge was entitled to find the breach serious given the reduced effective time for agreement, the distraction caused by the late application, and the lack of reasonable excuse; the decision was within the judge's discretion and not plainly wrong.
- Citation
- [2017] EWHC 1713 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Jagdish Lakhani and another; Defendants/appellants: Ibrahim Sheikh Abadullah Mahmud and others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Relief From Sanctions Under CPR 3.14
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Costs Budgeting, Non Compliance With Court Orders, CPR 3.14, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jagdish Lakhani and another
Claimants/respondents
Ibrahim Sheikh Abadullah Mahmud and others
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appeal From County Court Decision on Relief From Sanctions Under CPR 3.14
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing relief from sanctions for late filing of costs budget under CPR 3.14
- 2 Whether the breach was serious or significant
- 3 Whether there was a reasonable excuse for the default
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was entitled to find the breach serious given the reduced effective time for agreement, the distraction caused by the late application, and the lack of reasonable excuse; the decision was within the judge's discretion and not plainly wrong.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Defendants refused relief from sanctions for late filing of costs budget under CPR 3.14
- Defendants limited to recovering court fees only if successful at trial
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment