Francis v F Berndes Ltd & Ors [2021] EWHC 2350 (Ch) (01 July 2021)
The claimant did not issue, file, or serve an application for permission to amend the claim form and particulars of claim by the deadline set by Henderson J's order. The evidence of the claimant and his witnesses was inconsistent, unconvincing, and contradicted by contemporaneous documents. No application notice was ever produced or received by the court or the defendant. The breach of the order was serious and significant, and the claimant's explanations for the delay were inadequate. Relief from sanctions and a retrospective extension of time were refused.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 2350 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Patrick Francis; First Defendant: F Berndes Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Amend Claim and for Relief From Sanctions
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Relief From Sanctions, Amendment of Pleadings, Restitution, Limitation Periods, Compliance With Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Francis
Claimant
F Berndes Limited
First Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Permission to Amend Claim and for Relief From Sanctions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant issued, filed and served an application for permission to amend the claim form and particulars of claim by the deadline set by Henderson J's order of 15 December 2011
- 2 Whether the claimant should be granted a retrospective extension of time for compliance with the order to apply for permission to amend
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant did not issue, file, or serve an application for permission to amend the claim form and particulars of claim by the deadline set by Henderson J's order. The evidence of the claimant and his witnesses was inconsistent, unconvincing, and contradicted by contemporaneous documents. No application notice was ever produced or received by the court or the defendant. The breach of the order was serious and significant, and the claimant's explanations for the delay were inadequate. Relief from sanctions and a retrospective extension of time were refused.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Claimant's application for permission to relist and amend claim dismissed
- Claimant's application for retrospective extension of time refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment