G v H (Relocation to Australia: Immigration Issues) [2024] EWFC 230 (B) (24 January 2024)
On a fine balance, X's additional needs and the insecurity of the mother's situation (financial and immigration) outweigh the detriment to X's relationship with his father. The court finds that relocation to Australia is in X's best interests, given the mother's capacity to provide stability, family support, and financial security there, despite the risk of significant damage to the father-son relationship.
- Citation
- [2024] EWFC 230 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant (mother): G; Respondent (father): H
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act 1989 Relocation Application / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application granted; permission to relocate with X to Australia.
- Legal Topics
- Relocation of Child, Parental Responsibility, Child's Welfare, Contact Arrangements, Immigration Status, Financial Support
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
G
Applicant (mother)
H
Respondent (father)
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Relocation Application / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Should the mother be permitted to relocate with X to Australia?
- 2 What are the welfare implications for X of relocation?
- 3 How should contact between X and his father be structured post-relocation?
Ratio Decidendi
On a fine balance, X's additional needs and the insecurity of the mother's situation (financial and immigration) outweigh the detriment to X's relationship with his father. The court finds that relocation to Australia is in X's best interests, given the mother's capacity to provide stability, family support, and financial security there, despite the risk of significant damage to the father-son relationship.
Court Disposition
Application granted; permission to relocate with X to Australia.
Orders
- Mother permitted to relocate with X to Australia from end of school term (March).
- Mother must make X available for contact with father during father's visits to Town L, up to two weeks per visit, with notice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment