Fehn Schiffahrts GmbH & Co KG v Romani SPA
The award is remitted to the Tribunal solely to reconsider its finding that the respondent had title to sue based on the assignment; the issue of title to sue under the charterparty has already been determined and cannot be reopened. Owners are the successful party and are entitled to their costs. Permission to appeal is refused as there is no matter of general public importance or special reason.
- Parties
- Appellant/owners: Fehn Schiffahrts GmbH & Co KG; Respondent/charterers: Romani SpA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Arbitration Appeal / Judgment on Scope of Remission and Costs Assessment
- Outcome
- Award remitted to Tribunal on limited basis; costs awarded to owners; permission to appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- Remission of Arbitral Award, Title to Sue, Costs Assessment, Permission to Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fehn Schiffahrts GmbH & Co KG
Appellant/owners
Romani SpA
Respondent/charterers
Procedural Posture
Commercial Arbitration Appeal / Judgment on Scope of Remission and Costs Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Scope of remission to the Tribunal following appeal
- 2 Whether Tribunal may reconsider title to sue under charterparty as well as assignment
- 3 Entitlement to costs of the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The award is remitted to the Tribunal solely to reconsider its finding that the respondent had title to sue based on the assignment; the issue of title to sue under the charterparty has already been determined and cannot be reopened. Owners are the successful party and are entitled to their costs. Permission to appeal is refused as there is no matter of general public importance or special reason.
Court Disposition
Award remitted to Tribunal on limited basis; costs awarded to owners; permission to appeal refused.
Orders
- Award remitted to Tribunal to reconsider finding that respondent had title to sue based on the assignment.
- Owners awarded costs of the appeal, summarily assessed at £32,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment