Ullah & Ors v Shah & Ors
The Executive Committee validly removed the defendant as holding trustee pursuant to Clause M(1), constitutional amendments extending committee terms were validly passed in 2007, ratification at the 2014 AGM was effective, and Clause H(4) validated proceedings despite any failure to notify all members.
- Parties
- Claimant: Rashid Ullah & Ors; First Defendant: Bahadar Shah; Nominal Defendant: Second Defendant; Nominal Defendant: Third Defendant
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claimant succeeds; removal of defendant as holding trustee declared effective
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Trustee, Constitutional Amendment, Ratification of Committee Actions, Membership Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rashid Ullah & Ors
Claimant
Bahadar Shah
First Defendant
Second Defendant
Nominal Defendant
Third Defendant
Nominal Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Executive Committee validly removed the defendant as holding trustee
- 2 Whether constitutional amendments extending committee terms were valid
- 3 Whether ratification at the 2014 AGM was effective
Ratio Decidendi
The Executive Committee validly removed the defendant as holding trustee pursuant to Clause M(1), constitutional amendments extending committee terms were validly passed in 2007, ratification at the 2014 AGM was effective, and Clause H(4) validated proceedings despite any failure to notify all members.
Court Disposition
Claimant succeeds; removal of defendant as holding trustee declared effective
Orders
- Declaration that removal of Bahadar Shah as holding trustee was effective
- Consequential relief to be determined after further argument
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment