Sierra Fishing Company & Ors v Farran & Ors [2015] EWHC 140 (Comm) (30 January 2015)
There were multiple independent circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubts as to Mr Ali Zbeeb's impartiality, including his legal and business connections with Dr Farran and Finance Bank, his involvement in drafting agreements central to the dispute, and his conduct and communications during the arbitration and court proceedings. The Claimants did not take part in the arbitration without raising the objection forthwith once the relevant circumstances arose or became known, and thus did not lose the right to object under s.73 Arbitration Act 1996.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 140 (Comm)
- Parties
- First Claimant: SFC; Second Claimant: Mr Said Mohamed; Third Claimant: Estate of late father of Mr Bassem Jamil Said Mohamed and Mr Said Mohamed; First Defendant: Dr Farran; Second Defendant: Mr Assad; Third Defendant / Arbitrator: Mr Ali Zbeeb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Removal of Arbitrator / Judgment on Application Under S.24(1)(a) Arbitration Act 1996
- Outcome
- Application for removal of Mr Ali Zbeeb as arbitrator granted.
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Arbitrator, Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrator, Loss of Right to Object Under S.73 Arbitration Act 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SFC
First Claimant
Mr Said Mohamed
Second Claimant
Estate of late father of Mr Bassem Jamil Said Mohamed and Mr Said Mohamed
Third Claimant
Dr Farran
First Defendant
Mr Assad
Second Defendant
Mr Ali Zbeeb
Third Defendant / Arbitrator
Procedural Posture
Application for Removal of Arbitrator / Judgment on Application Under S.24(1)(a) Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether circumstances exist giving rise to justifiable doubts as to Mr Ali Zbeeb's impartiality under s.24(1)(a) Arbitration Act 1996
- 2 Whether Claimants have lost the right to object under s.73 Arbitration Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
There were multiple independent circumstances giving rise to justifiable doubts as to Mr Ali Zbeeb's impartiality, including his legal and business connections with Dr Farran and Finance Bank, his involvement in drafting agreements central to the dispute, and his conduct and communications during the arbitration and court proceedings. The Claimants did not take part in the arbitration without raising the objection forthwith once the relevant circumstances arose or became known, and thus did not lose the right to object under s.73 Arbitration Act 1996.
Court Disposition
Application for removal of Mr Ali Zbeeb as arbitrator granted.
Orders
- Mr Ali Zbeeb is removed as arbitrator under s.24(1)(a) Arbitration Act 1996.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment