Sinclair v Woods of Winchester Ltd.
The Claimants' applications failed because they were out of time, had lost their right to object by not raising complaints promptly, failed to exhaust recourse to the arbitrator, and no serious irregularity or substantial injustice was demonstrated in the arbitrator's conduct or award.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sinclair; 1st Defendant: Woods of Winchester Ltd.; 2nd Defendant: Harrison
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Claim / Judgment on Applications for Removal of Arbitrator and Setting Aside Award
- Outcome
- Applications dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Arbitrator, Serious Irregularity, Substantial Injustice, Arbitration Act 1996, Procedural Fairness, Delay, Jurisdictional Objections
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sinclair
Claimant
Woods of Winchester Ltd.
1st Defendant
Harrison
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Claim / Judgment on Applications for Removal of Arbitrator and Setting Aside Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator's conduct amounted to serious irregularity under section 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996
- 2 Whether substantial injustice was caused to the Claimants
- 3 Whether the arbitrator should be removed under section 24 of the Arbitration Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimants' applications failed because they were out of time, had lost their right to object by not raising complaints promptly, failed to exhaust recourse to the arbitrator, and no serious irregularity or substantial injustice was demonstrated in the arbitrator's conduct or award.
Court Disposition
Applications dismissed
Orders
- Application under section 68 Arbitration Act 1996 dismissed as out of time
- Application under section 24 Arbitration Act 1996 dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment