Watson & Ors v Perotti & Anor [2002] EWCA Civ 771 (25 April 2002)
The judge erred in making an adjustment to the quantum of remuneration without giving the appellant an opportunity to make submissions, especially as the adjustment did not logically follow from the previous reasoning and figures. The Court of Appeal itself reassessed the proper figure for remuneration, reducing it from £32,500 to £30,000 plus VAT.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 771
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Watson and Others; Defendant/appellant: Perotti and Another
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Chancery Division (neuberger J) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Remuneration of Administrators, Professional Charging Clauses, Procedural Fairness, Appeals Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Watson and Others
Claimant/respondent
Perotti and Another
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Chancery Division (neuberger J) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge was entitled to adjust the quantum of remuneration without hearing submissions from the appellant after a material change in the basis for calculation.
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in making an adjustment to the quantum of remuneration without giving the appellant an opportunity to make submissions, especially as the adjustment did not logically follow from the previous reasoning and figures. The Court of Appeal itself reassessed the proper figure for remuneration, reducing it from £32,500 to £30,000 plus VAT.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Remuneration allowed to claimants reduced to £30,000 plus VAT (total £34,500)
- Order below to be amended accordingly
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment