Bello v Ideal View [2009] EWHC 2808 (QB) (14 October 2009)
The tenant is bound by the arbitrator's award determining the rent; delay alone does not bar the landlord's claim where time is not of the essence; the arrears did not fall due until determined by arbitration and demanded, so the claim is not time-barred; and there is no evidence of estoppel or other equitable bar.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 2808 (QB)
- Parties
- Applicant/defendant: Adejola Bello; Respondent/claimant: Ideal View
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Possession Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Rent Review, Limitation Periods, Forfeiture for Rent Arrears, Arbitration, Estoppel, Delay and Laches
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adejola Bello
Applicant/defendant
Ideal View
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Possession Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay in seeking rent review bars landlord's claim for higher rent
- 2 Whether arrears of rent are time-barred under section 19 of the Limitation Act 1980
- 3 Whether time was of the essence for rent review under the lease
Ratio Decidendi
The tenant is bound by the arbitrator's award determining the rent; delay alone does not bar the landlord's claim where time is not of the essence; the arrears did not fall due until determined by arbitration and demanded, so the claim is not time-barred; and there is no evidence of estoppel or other equitable bar.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Possession order stands
- Tenant liable for rent arrears as determined by arbitration
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment