Lancecrest Ltd. v Asiwaju [2005] EWCA Civ 117 (11 February 2005)

Lancecrest Ltd. v Asiwaju [2005] EWCA Civ 117 (11 February 2005)

Time was not of the essence for the landlord's trigger notice under the rent review clause, so the late notice was valid. The tenant's letter, though challenging the right to review, was objectively sufficient to constitute a valid counter-notice as it indicated non-acceptance of the proposed rent.

Citation
[2005] EWCA Civ 117
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Lancecrest Limited; Defendant/appellant: Dr Ganiyu Asiwaju
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 February 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed on the first issue (trigger notice validity), allowed on the second issue (counter-notice validity)
Legal Topics
Rent Review Clauses, Validity of Notices, Time of the Essence, Interpretation of Lease Provisions
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Rent Review Clauses Validity of Notices Time of the Essence Interpretation of Lease Provisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lancecrest Limited

Claimant/respondent

Dr Ganiyu Asiwaju

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a landlord's late trigger notice for rent review is valid under the lease
  2. 2 Whether the tenant's letter constituted a valid counter-notice under the lease

Ratio Decidendi

Time was not of the essence for the landlord's trigger notice under the rent review clause, so the late notice was valid. The tenant's letter, though challenging the right to review, was objectively sufficient to constitute a valid counter-notice as it indicated non-acceptance of the proposed rent.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed on the first issue (trigger notice validity), allowed on the second issue (counter-notice validity)

Orders

  • Landlord's rent review notice of 19 February 2002 is valid.
  • Tenant's letter of 5 March 2002 is a valid counter-notice.