Glenfield Motor Spares Ltd v Smith
The Judge was not entitled to attach substantial weight to the prior expert determination, which was unreasoned, hearsay, and not subject to cross-examination; the determination was central to the Judge's decision and this approach was flawed.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Glenfield Motor Spares Limited; Defendant/appellant: Brian Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Judge's decision as to usable area set aside; issue remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Rent Review, Expert Evidence, Usable Area Determination, Weight of Prior Expert Determination, Hearsay in Civil Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Glenfield Motor Spares Limited
Claimant/respondent
Brian Smith
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Judge erred in relying on a prior expert determination for usable area
- 2 Appropriate weight to hearsay and prior expert opinion in civil proceedings
- 3 Correct determination of usable area for rent calculation
Ratio Decidendi
The Judge was not entitled to attach substantial weight to the prior expert determination, which was unreasoned, hearsay, and not subject to cross-examination; the determination was central to the Judge's decision and this approach was flawed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Judge's decision as to usable area set aside; issue remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- Judge's decision as to usable area of the site set aside.
- Issue of usable area remitted to Leicester County Court for rehearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment