Glenfield Motor Spares Ltd v Smith

Glenfield Motor Spares Ltd v Smith

The Judge was not entitled to attach substantial weight to the prior expert determination, which was unreasoned, hearsay, and not subject to cross-examination; the determination was central to the Judge's decision and this approach was flawed.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Glenfield Motor Spares Limited; Defendant/appellant: Brian Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; Judge's decision as to usable area set aside; issue remitted for rehearing.
Legal Topics
Rent Review, Expert Evidence, Usable Area Determination, Weight of Prior Expert Determination, Hearsay in Civil Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Glenfield Motor Spares Limited

Claimant/respondent

Brian Smith

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court

  1. 1 Whether the Judge erred in relying on a prior expert determination for usable area
  2. 2 Appropriate weight to hearsay and prior expert opinion in civil proceedings
  3. 3 Correct determination of usable area for rent calculation

Ratio Decidendi

The Judge was not entitled to attach substantial weight to the prior expert determination, which was unreasoned, hearsay, and not subject to cross-examination; the determination was central to the Judge's decision and this approach was flawed.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; Judge's decision as to usable area set aside; issue remitted for rehearing.

Orders

  • Judge's decision as to usable area of the site set aside.
  • Issue of usable area remitted to Leicester County Court for rehearing.