Green v White Lantern Film (Britannica) Ltd & Anor [2023] EWHC 930 (Ch) (28 April 2023)
The court found that Eva Green did not renounce or repudiate the Artist Agreement on 22 September 2019. The evidence, including contemporaneous audio recordings, did not support the Defendants' case that she unequivocally withdrew her services or agreed to return the fee. The Defendants' witnesses were found to have given false or unreliable evidence on this central issue. The breakdown of the film production was due to the Defendants' failure to secure long-term finance and their insistence on production terms unacceptable to Ms Green, but she did not refuse to perform if required. The tort claims of conspiracy, deceit, and unlawful interference were not made out as there was no...
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 930 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant/defendant to Counterclaim and Additional Claim: Eva Green; Defendant/counterclaimant: White Lantern Film (Britannica) Ltd; Additional Claimant: SMC Speciality Finance LLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- High Court Civil Claim (business and Property Courts, Chancery Division) / Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; counterclaim and additional claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Renunciation of Contract, Repudiatory Breach, Pay or Play Agreements, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Deceit, Unlawful Interference With Economic Interests
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eva Green
Claimant/defendant to Counterclaim and Additional Claim
White Lantern Film (Britannica) Ltd
Defendant/counterclaimant
SMC Speciality Finance LLC
Additional Claimant
Procedural Posture
High Court Civil Claim (business and Property Courts, Chancery Division) / Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Eva Green renounced the Artist Agreement on 22 September 2019
- 2 Whether Eva Green was in repudiatory breach of the Artist Agreement
- 3 Whether Eva Green is entitled to the $1 million fee under the Artist Agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Eva Green did not renounce or repudiate the Artist Agreement on 22 September 2019. The evidence, including contemporaneous audio recordings, did not support the Defendants' case that she unequivocally withdrew her services or agreed to return the fee. The Defendants' witnesses were found to have given false or unreliable evidence on this central issue. The breakdown of the film production was due to the Defendants' failure to secure long-term finance and their insistence on production terms unacceptable to Ms Green, but she did not refuse to perform if required. The tort claims of conspiracy, deceit, and unlawful interference were not made out as there was no...
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; counterclaim and additional claims dismissed
Orders
- Eva Green is entitled to the $1 million fee under the Artist Agreement.
- Defendants' counterclaim and additional tort claims are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment