South Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust v Laindon Holdings Ltd
The replacement of tiled carpets with broadloom carpet was a permitted alteration under the lease, not a breach of covenant. Damages for a void period after the landlord was put in funds for the tenant’s breaches were not recoverable, as further delay was the landlord’s commercial choice.
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: South Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust; Respondent/claimant: Laindon Holdings Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Repairing Covenants, Dilapidations, Lease Interpretation, Damages Quantification
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
Appellant/defendant
Laindon Holdings Ltd
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether replacement of tiled carpets with broadloom carpet constituted a breach of repairing covenant or a permitted alteration under the lease
- 2 Whether the landlord was entitled to damages for a void period after being put in funds for tenant's breaches
Ratio Decidendi
The replacement of tiled carpets with broadloom carpet was a permitted alteration under the lease, not a breach of covenant. Damages for a void period after the landlord was put in funds for the tenant’s breaches were not recoverable, as further delay was the landlord’s commercial choice.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed on both grounds
- Damages award for carpets set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment