Santander Consumer (UK) PLC v Chaudhry [2024] EWHC 170 (KB) (31 January 2024)
Repossession of the vehicle by the creditor from police custody, where the police held the vehicle under statutory powers and not as bailee for the debtor, does not constitute repossession 'from the debtor' under section 90 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The debtor's right to possession was suspended during police seizure, and subsequent retention by the creditor did not trigger section 90 protections. There was no unfair relationship or unfair term, and no breach of the Data Protection Act.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 170 (KB)
- Parties
- Respondent/claimant: Santander Consumer (UK) PLC; Appellant/defendant: Miss Meher-un-Nisa Chaudhry
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Repossession of Goods, Conditional Sale Agreement, Section 90 Consumer Credit Act 1974, Default Notice, Unfair Relationship, Unfair Contract Terms, Data Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Santander Consumer (UK) PLC
Respondent/claimant
Miss Meher-un-Nisa Chaudhry
Appellant/defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether repossession of a vehicle by the creditor from police custody constitutes repossession 'from the debtor' under section 90 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974
- 2 Whether the debtor's right to possession is suspended during police seizure under statutory powers
- 3 Whether retention of the vehicle by the creditor after police seizure triggers section 90 protections
Ratio Decidendi
Repossession of the vehicle by the creditor from police custody, where the police held the vehicle under statutory powers and not as bailee for the debtor, does not constitute repossession 'from the debtor' under section 90 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. The debtor's right to possession was suspended during police seizure, and subsequent retention by the creditor did not trigger section 90 protections. There was no unfair relationship or unfair term, and no breach of the Data Protection Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Recorder's order stands
- Appellant liable to pay £18,132.69 to Respondent for breach of contract
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment