Trustees of the AFM and SAG-AFTRA Intellectual Property Rights Distribution Fund & Ors v The Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology
Representative claims under CPR 19.8 may proceed only if damages can be assessed on a common basis without individualised inquiry; since the claimants' proposals do not adequately address practicalities if causation arguments fail, the court grants a limited further opportunity for claimants to demonstrate viability, but does not bring the representative claims to an end at this stage. PPL is permitted to intervene by written submissions under the court's inherent jurisdiction.
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Trustees of the AFM and SAG-AFTRA Intellectual Property Rights Distribution Fund & Others; Defendant/applicant: Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology; Intervener: Phonographic Performance Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs and Case Management Conference (ccmc)
- Outcome
- Representative claims under CPR 19.8 not struck out; claimants given limited further opportunity to demonstrate viability. Trial adjourned. PPL permitted to intervene by written submissions.
- Legal Topics
- Representative Actions, Francovich Damages, Equitable Remuneration, EU Law Implementation, Case Management, Intervention
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trustees of the AFM and SAG-AFTRA Intellectual Property Rights Distribution Fund & Others
Claimants/respondents
Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology
Defendant/applicant
Phonographic Performance Limited
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs and Case Management Conference (ccmc)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether representative claims under CPR 19.8 are viable for Francovich damages on behalf of US Performers
- 2 Whether to adjourn the trial
- 3 Whether to permit PPL to intervene
Ratio Decidendi
Representative claims under CPR 19.8 may proceed only if damages can be assessed on a common basis without individualised inquiry; since the claimants' proposals do not adequately address practicalities if causation arguments fail, the court grants a limited further opportunity for claimants to demonstrate viability, but does not bring the representative claims to an end at this stage. PPL is permitted to intervene by written submissions under the court's inherent jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Representative claims under CPR 19.8 not struck out; claimants given limited further opportunity to demonstrate viability. Trial adjourned. PPL permitted to intervene by written submissions.
Orders
- Claimants to contact a sample of US Performers within 8 weeks to obtain information on residence/citizenship and consent to joinder.
- Claimants to provide schedule and analysis to SoS demonstrating value and viability of claims proceeding to second stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment