Howells & Anor v Dominion Insurance Company Ltd [2005] EWHC 552 (QB) (07 April 2005)
The authority to litigate is provided by the rules of court in representative proceedings; all club members were parties to the insurance contract and thus liable for the judgment sum, subject to any special circumstances; enforcement against individual members is permissible with the court's permission, but represented persons are not individually liable for costs absent a special order.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 552
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: David Roy Howells and James Kelly (on behalf of themselves and all other members of the Hemel Hempstead Football & Sports Club); Defendants/appellants: The Dominion Insurance Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Order of Master Foster
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Representative Actions, Enforcement of Judgments, Liability of Members of Unincorporated Associations, Costs in Representative Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Roy Howells and James Kelly (on behalf of themselves and all other members of the Hemel Hempstead Football & Sports Club)
Claimants/respondents
The Dominion Insurance Company Limited
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Order of Master Foster
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judgment and costs order can be enforced against individual members of an unincorporated association in representative proceedings
- 2 Whether club members' liability is limited to their subscriptions
- 3 Whether authority to litigate is required for enforcement against members
Ratio Decidendi
The authority to litigate is provided by the rules of court in representative proceedings; all club members were parties to the insurance contract and thus liable for the judgment sum, subject to any special circumstances; enforcement against individual members is permissible with the court's permission, but represented persons are not individually liable for costs absent a special order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- Remitted to the Master to consider, in his discretion, whether to grant permission to enforce the judgment against individual members, having regard to any special circumstances.
- Appeal against costs liability dismissed; represented persons not individually liable for costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment