Howells & Anor v Dominion Insurance Company Ltd [2005] EWHC 552 (QB) (07 April 2005)
The judgment and debt arising from the insurance contract are enforceable against individual members of the unincorporated club, as they were parties to the contract through their representatives; lack of express authority to litigate is irrelevant under CPR 19.6, which provides the necessary authority for representative proceedings. However, represented persons are not individually liable for costs unless a specific order is made.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 552 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: David Roy Howells and James Kelly (on behalf of themselves and all other members of the Hemel Hempstead Football & Sports Club); Defendants/appellants: The Dominion Insurance Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Master Foster's Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Representative Actions, Enforcement of Judgments, Unincorporated Associations, Personal Liability of Members, Costs Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Roy Howells and James Kelly (on behalf of themselves and all other members of the Hemel Hempstead Football & Sports Club)
Claimants/respondents
The Dominion Insurance Company Limited
Defendants/appellants
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Judgment on Appeal From Master Foster's Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a judgment and costs order against an unincorporated association can be enforced against individual members
- 2 Whether individual members are personally liable for debts and costs arising from representative litigation
Ratio Decidendi
The judgment and debt arising from the insurance contract are enforceable against individual members of the unincorporated club, as they were parties to the contract through their representatives; lack of express authority to litigate is irrelevant under CPR 19.6, which provides the necessary authority for representative proceedings. However, represented persons are not individually liable for costs unless a specific order is made.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; cross-appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Remitted to the Master to consider, in his discretion, whether to grant permission to enforce the judgment against individual members, having regard to any special circumstances.
- Appeal against costs liability dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment