Force India Formula One Team Ltd v Etihad Airways PJSC & Anor

Force India Formula One Team Ltd v Etihad Airways PJSC & Anor

Force India committed a series of deliberate, cumulative, and irremediable breaches of the sponsorship agreement, including unilaterally changing the team name and livery and promoting a rival airline, which amounted to repudiatory breach. The sponsors did not affirm, waive, or acquiesce in these breaches. The sponsors were therefore entitled to terminate the contract for repudiation and claim damages. The clause 16.3 bonus was not payable as the team was placed last among valid competitors.

Parties
Respondent / Claimant: Force India Formula One Team Limited; Appellant / Defendant: Etihad Airways PJSC; Appellant / Defendant: Aldar Properties PJSC
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 October 2010
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; judgment of High Court reversed
Legal Topics
Repudiatory Breach, Termination of Contract, Sponsorship Agreements, Affirmation and Waiver, Remediability of Breach, Damages for Repudiation
Contract Law Commercial Law Repudiatory Breach Termination of Contract Sponsorship Agreements Affirmation and Waiver Remediability of Breach Damages for Repudiation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Force India Formula One Team Limited

Respondent / Claimant

Etihad Airways PJSC

Appellant / Defendant

Aldar Properties PJSC

Appellant / Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Force India committed a repudiatory breach of the sponsorship agreement entitling Etihad and Aldar to terminate the contract
  2. 2 Whether breaches were remediable or irremediable under the contract
  3. 3 Whether the sponsors affirmed, waived, or acquiesced in the breaches

Ratio Decidendi

Force India committed a series of deliberate, cumulative, and irremediable breaches of the sponsorship agreement, including unilaterally changing the team name and livery and promoting a rival airline, which amounted to repudiatory breach. The sponsors did not affirm, waive, or acquiesce in these breaches. The sponsors were therefore entitled to terminate the contract for repudiation and claim damages. The clause 16.3 bonus was not payable as the team was placed last among valid competitors.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; judgment of High Court reversed

Orders

  • Sponsors entitled to terminate contract for repudiatory breach
  • Force India's claim for damages dismissed