GDS Gardner Design Services Ltd v Basic Partition Systems Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1337 (30 May 2002)
The reappointment of Mr and Mrs Jones to the board and Mr Jones's assumption of executive control constituted a repudiatory breach of the heads of agreement and service agreement, entitling GDS to terminate the agreements and claim damages, including the £300,000 bonus under clause 16.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1337
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: GDS Gardner Design Services Limited; Defendant/appellant: Basic Partition Systems Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Repudiatory Breach of Contract, Service Agreements, Heads of Agreement, Executive Management Rights, Damages for Breach, Bonus Entitlement on Termination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GDS Gardner Design Services Limited
Claimant/respondent
Basic Partition Systems Limited
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the reappointment and assumption of executive control by Mr Jones constituted a repudiatory breach of the heads of agreement and/or service agreement
- 2 Whether such breach entitled GDS to damages and a contractual bonus under clause 16
Ratio Decidendi
The reappointment of Mr and Mrs Jones to the board and Mr Jones's assumption of executive control constituted a repudiatory breach of the heads of agreement and service agreement, entitling GDS to terminate the agreements and claim damages, including the £300,000 bonus under clause 16.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay damages of £27,494.76 to respondent for breach of service agreement
- Appellant to pay £300,000 bonus to respondent under clause 16 of heads of agreement
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment