Baxendale-Walker v APL Management Ltd [2018] EWHC 543 (Ch) (19 March 2018)

Baxendale-Walker v APL Management Ltd [2018] EWHC 543 (Ch) (19 March 2018)

Mr Baxendale-Walker's claims to avoid the Burleigh Loan are barred by cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel, as the enforceability of the loan was determined in prior County Court proceedings and all challenges other than regulatory issues were expressly or impliedly abandoned. The attempt to relitigate these...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] EWHC 543 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant/defendant: Paul Baxendale-Walker; Defendant/claimant: APL Management Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
19 March 2018
Procedural Posture
High Court Chancery Division (property, Trusts and Probate) / Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment Applications
Outcome
Claims to avoid the Burleigh and Amberleigh Loans struck out and/or summary judgment granted for APL; profits claim struck out; possession order granted to APL.
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Cause of Action Estoppel, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Consumer Credit, Possession Proceedings, Trust Beneficiary Rights
Civil Procedure Property Law Trusts Law Contract Law Res Judicata Cause of Action Estoppel Issue Estoppel Abuse of Process +3 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Baxendale-Walker

Claimant/defendant

APL Management Limited

Defendant/claimant

Procedural Posture

High Court Chancery Division (property, Trusts and Probate) / Strike Out And/or Summary Judgment Applications

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Mr Baxendale-Walker's claims to avoid the Burleigh and Amberleigh Loans are barred by res judicata, cause of action estoppel, issue estoppel, or abuse of process
  2. 2 Whether new information justifies relitigation of issues decided in prior proceedings
  3. 3 Whether Mr Baxendale-Walker has standing to bring a profits claim as a beneficiary of the Trusts

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Baxendale-Walker's claims to avoid the Burleigh Loan are barred by cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel, as the enforceability of the loan was determined in prior County Court proceedings and all challenges other than regulatory issues were expressly or impliedly abandoned. The attempt to relitigate these issues constitutes an abuse of process under the Henderson v Henderson principle. The same reasoning applies to the Amberleigh Loan, as the matters now raised could and should have been brought in the earlier proceedings. No genuinely new information has been identified that could not have been discovered with reasonable diligence. The profits claim is not res judicata but is...

Court Disposition

Claims to avoid the Burleigh and Amberleigh Loans struck out and/or summary judgment granted for APL; profits claim struck out; possession order granted to APL.

Orders

  • Mr Baxendale-Walker's claims to avoid the Burleigh and Amberleigh Loans are struck out and/or summary judgment is entered for APL.
  • Mr Baxendale-Walker's profits claim is struck out.