Society Of Lloyd's v Leighs & Ors [1997] EWCA Civ 2283 (31st July, 1997)

Society Of Lloyd's v Leighs & Ors [1997] EWCA Civ 2283 (31st July, 1997)

The R & R scheme and Equitas Contract were within the statutory powers of the Society of Lloyd's; Section 8(1) of the 1982 Act does not prohibit mutualisation in ancillary contracts. Rescission for fraud was not available to the Names due to the impossibility of restoring parties to their original positions and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1997] EWCA Civ 2283
Parties
Plaintiff/respondent: Society of Lloyd's; Defendant/appellant: Dennis Hugh Reginald Leighs; Defendant/appellant: Geoffrey Herbert Lyon; Defendant/appellant: David Walter Wilkinson; Intervenors: Canadian Names
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court) to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rescission for Fraud, Ultra Vires Acts, Set Off and Counterclaim, Interpretation of Contractual Clauses, Statutory Powers of Lloyd's, Stay of Execution
Contract Law Insurance Law Company Law Rescission for Fraud Ultra Vires Acts Set Off and Counterclaim Interpretation of Contractual Clauses Statutory Powers of Lloyd's +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 17 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Society of Lloyd's

Plaintiff/respondent

Dennis Hugh Reginald Leighs

Defendant/appellant

Geoffrey Herbert Lyon

Defendant/appellant

David Walter Wilkinson

Defendant/appellant

Canadian Names

Intervenors

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court) to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the R & R scheme and Equitas Contract were ultra vires the Society of Lloyd's
  2. 2 Whether Names could rescind their General Undertakings for fraudulent misrepresentation and avoid liability under the Equitas Contract
  3. 3 Whether Clause 5.5 of the Equitas Contract precludes set-off or counterclaim for fraud against the Society's claim for premiums

Ratio Decidendi

The R & R scheme and Equitas Contract were within the statutory powers of the Society of Lloyd's; Section 8(1) of the 1982 Act does not prohibit mutualisation in ancillary contracts. Rescission for fraud was not available to the Names due to the impossibility of restoring parties to their original positions and the adverse effect on third-party rights. Clause 5.5 of the Equitas Contract validly precluded set-off or counterclaim, including for fraud, against the Society's claim for premiums. The court's discretion to stay execution should not be exercised in light of the contractual waiver and commercial necessity.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeals dismissed with costs; respondent to be paid by the appellants and intervenors jointly and severally on a numerical basis, such costs to be taxed.
  • Liberty to apply to all parties as to supplemental orders for costs.