Falloon v Khan & Anor [2026] EWHC 515 (Ch) (13 March 2026)

Falloon v Khan & Anor [2026] EWHC 515 (Ch) (13 March 2026)

The claimant failed to establish any misrepresentation, mistake, or breach of fiduciary duty; the evidence showed Mrs Falloon agreed to the sale at £210,000, was represented by solicitors, and authorised the payment arrangements; the TR1 was validly executed and effective to transfer title; there was no basis for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] EWHC 515 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: Jeffery Falloon (representing the estate of Mrs Clephane Evaline Falloon); First Defendant: Adnan Ali Khan; Second Defendant: Kuflink Security Trustees Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 March 2026
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Rescission of Contract, Sale of Land, Rectification of Register, Misrepresentation, Mistake of Law, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Limitation Period, Validity of TR1, Enforceability Under Law of Property (miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989
Property Law Equity and Trusts Civil Procedure Rescission of Contract Sale of Land Rectification of Register Misrepresentation Mistake of Law +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jeffery Falloon (representing the estate of Mrs Clephane Evaline Falloon)

Claimant

Adnan Ali Khan

First Defendant

Kuflink Security Trustees Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim (chancery Division) / Final Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the contract for sale of land should be rescinded for misrepresentation, mistake of law, or breach of fiduciary duty
  2. 2 Whether the TR1 transferring title to the first defendant is invalid or voidable
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to rectification of the register and financial remedies

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to establish any misrepresentation, mistake, or breach of fiduciary duty; the evidence showed Mrs Falloon agreed to the sale at £210,000, was represented by solicitors, and authorised the payment arrangements; the TR1 was validly executed and effective to transfer title; there was no basis for rescission or rectification.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim for rescission, rectification, and financial remedies dismissed
  • No order for rectification of the register