W (minors), Re [2007] EWHC 649 (Fam) (07 March 2007)
The court found no material change in circumstances since previous findings. The father's continued refusal to accept psychiatric advice, his adversarial and conspiratorial approach, and the risk of emotional harm to the children precluded unsupervised contact or a residence order in his favour. The mother's address should remain confidential due to risk. The father's repeated, unmeritorious applications justified a s.91(14) order. Supervised contact may continue if agreed and safe. The children's welfare required stability and protection from further litigation.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 649 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant Father: GW; Respondent Mother: PB; Applicant Grandparent: Parental Grandmother; Children: Minors (W and L)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Proceedings (residence, Contact, Prohibited Steps, Committal, S.91(14), Ancillary Relief, Passport Direction) / Final Hearing After Multiple Prior Hearings and Appeals
- Outcome
- Applications by the father and grandparents for residence and unsupervised contact dismissed. Mother's applications for confidentiality of address and s.91(14) order granted. Supervised contact may continue if agreed. Passports to be released to the mother. Committal application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Residence Orders, Contact Orders, Prohibited Steps Orders, Section 91(14) Orders, Ancillary Relief, Confidentiality of Address, Committal for Contempt
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
GW
Applicant Father
PB
Respondent Mother
Parental Grandmother
Applicant Grandparent
Minors (W and L)
Children
Procedural Posture
Children Act Proceedings (residence, Contact, Prohibited Steps, Committal, S.91(14), Ancillary Relief, Passport Direction) / Final Hearing After Multiple Prior Hearings and Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant a shared residence order or residence to the father or grandparents
- 2 Whether to order contact and in what form
- 3 Whether to allow the mother to keep her address confidential
Ratio Decidendi
The court found no material change in circumstances since previous findings. The father's continued refusal to accept psychiatric advice, his adversarial and conspiratorial approach, and the risk of emotional harm to the children precluded unsupervised contact or a residence order in his favour. The mother's address should remain confidential due to risk. The father's repeated, unmeritorious applications justified a s.91(14) order. Supervised contact may continue if agreed and safe. The children's welfare required stability and protection from further litigation.
Court Disposition
Applications by the father and grandparents for residence and unsupervised contact dismissed. Mother's applications for confidentiality of address and s.91(14) order granted. Supervised contact may continue if agreed. Passports to be released to the mother. Committal application dismissed.
Orders
- Residence order in favour of the mother continues.
- Father and grandparents' applications for residence and unsupervised contact dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment