M (A Child) [2005] EWCA Civ 1696 (6 December 2005)
The judge was not shown to be biased; the refusal to order a further CAFCASS report was within his discretion; the section 91(14) order was justified but should have been limited in time to three years to ensure proportionality.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1696
- Parties
- Applicant Mother: MM; Respondent Father: KM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal From County Court Orders
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused on residence order; permission granted and appeal allowed in part on section 91(14) order to impose a three-year time limit from 6 December 2005.
- Legal Topics
- Residence Orders, Contact Orders, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Judicial Bias, CAFCASS Reports, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MM
Applicant Mother
KM
Respondent Father
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal and Substantive Appeal From County Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge was biased against the applicant mother and should have recused himself
- 2 Whether the refusal to order a further CAFCASS report was a proper exercise of discretion
- 3 Whether the section 91(14) order was appropriate and proportionate
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was not shown to be biased; the refusal to order a further CAFCASS report was within his discretion; the section 91(14) order was justified but should have been limited in time to three years to ensure proportionality.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused on residence order; permission granted and appeal allowed in part on section 91(14) order to impose a three-year time limit from 6 December 2005.
Orders
- Residence order in favour of father stands.
- Section 91(14) order against mother limited to three years from 6 December 2005.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment