Mr E v Mrs E
The trial judge failed to conduct a proper analysis of the mother's relocation proposals and their impact on the children, did not adequately consider the children's welfare, and made a financial order that was internally inconsistent and discriminatory. Both the residence and financial orders were unsustainable and must be set aside for rehearing.
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Mr E; Appellant/respondent: Mrs E
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Chichester County Court Judgment of 7 December 2005
- Outcome
- Appeals allowed; orders set aside; matter remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Residence Orders, Ancillary Relief, Children's Welfare, Financial Provision, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr E
Appellant/respondent
Mrs E
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Chichester County Court Judgment of 7 December 2005
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in his approach to the children's residence and the mother's proposed relocation
- 2 Whether the financial order was internally inconsistent and discriminatory
- 3 Whether the orders made were in the best interests of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge failed to conduct a proper analysis of the mother's relocation proposals and their impact on the children, did not adequately consider the children's welfare, and made a financial order that was internally inconsistent and discriminatory. Both the residence and financial orders were unsustainable and must be set aside for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeals allowed; orders set aside; matter remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted to both parties.
- Both appeals allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment