NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY v CRESCENT PETROLEUM COMPANY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & Anor

NATIONAL IRANIAN OIL COMPANY v CRESCENT PETROLEUM COMPANY INTERNATIONAL LIMITED & Anor

The parties did not exclude the right to appeal under s. 69 Arbitration Act 1996 because the arbitration agreement only incorporated ICC Rules for procedural gaps in arbitration, not for appeals. The tribunal applied the correct legal test for res judicata and abuse of process, and its decision to preclude NIOC's quantum defences was not obviously wrong. Permission to appeal was refused as the statutory threshold was not met.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: National Iranian Oil Company; Defendant/applicant: Crescent Petroleum Company International Limited; Defendant/applicant: Crescent Gas Corporation Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Appeal (permission to Appeal) / Application for Permission to Appeal Under S. 69 Arbitration Act 1996
Outcome
Permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Res Judicata, Abuse of Process, Arbitration Appeals, Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements, Quantum of Damages
Arbitration Contract Law Civil Procedure Res Judicata Abuse of Process Arbitration Appeals Interpretation of Arbitration Agreements Quantum of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 21 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

National Iranian Oil Company

Claimant/respondent

Crescent Petroleum Company International Limited

Defendant/applicant

Crescent Gas Corporation Limited

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Arbitration Appeal (permission to Appeal) / Application for Permission to Appeal Under S. 69 Arbitration Act 1996

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the parties excluded the right to appeal on a point of law under s. 69 Arbitration Act 1996 by incorporating ICC Rules
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal applied the correct legal test for res judicata and abuse of process in bifurcated arbitration proceedings
  3. 3 Whether the tribunal's decision on preclusion of quantum defences was obviously wrong

Ratio Decidendi

The parties did not exclude the right to appeal under s. 69 Arbitration Act 1996 because the arbitration agreement only incorporated ICC Rules for procedural gaps in arbitration, not for appeals. The tribunal applied the correct legal test for res judicata and abuse of process, and its decision to preclude NIOC's quantum defences was not obviously wrong. Permission to appeal was refused as the statutory threshold was not met.

Court Disposition

Permission to appeal refused