Nobiskrug GmbH v Valla Yachts Ltd
The Tribunal did not determine that Valla Yachts was entitled to recover payments made to suppliers solely because they were made under a reservation of rights. Recovery depends on establishing Nobiskrug's liability to pay the suppliers under the Approved Contracts or that Nobiskrug's breach of project management obligations caused the payments. The Tribunal's findings were incomplete on causation and unjust enrichment, warranting remission for further consideration.
- Parties
- Claimant/builder: Nobiskrug GMBH; Defendant/purchaser: Valla Yachts Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Appeal / Appeal Under Section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; issues remitted to Tribunal for further consideration.
- Legal Topics
- Restitution, Unjust Enrichment, Project Management Obligations, Interpretation of Construction Contracts, Damages for Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nobiskrug GMBH
Claimant/builder
Valla Yachts Limited
Defendant/purchaser
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Appeal / Appeal Under Section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Valla Yachts is entitled to recover payments made to suppliers from Nobiskrug in restitution where Nobiskrug was not found liable to pay those suppliers under the Approved Contracts, solely on the basis that the payments were made subject to a reservation of rights.
- 2 Whether Nobiskrug breached its project management obligations under the Yacht Construction Agreement and whether such breach caused Valla Yachts to incur additional supplier costs.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not determine that Valla Yachts was entitled to recover payments made to suppliers solely because they were made under a reservation of rights. Recovery depends on establishing Nobiskrug's liability to pay the suppliers under the Approved Contracts or that Nobiskrug's breach of project management obligations caused the payments. The Tribunal's findings were incomplete on causation and unjust enrichment, warranting remission for further consideration.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; issues remitted to Tribunal for further consideration.
Orders
- The issues of unjust enrichment and damages are remitted to the Tribunal for further consideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment